The author's IGF blog

The author blogs about the book and the IGF at IGFWatch. You too can register on that site and post your own articles discussing Internet governance topics related to the book or the IGF. Here are links to the most recent articles on the site:

How IGF 2016 failed, and how IGF 2017 could do better
Workshops ...

The Internet Governance Forum wakes up to trade
The Internet Governance Forum (IGF) is a multi-stakeholder community that discusses a broad range of Internet issues, and seeks to identify possible shared solutions to current challenges. This year was the first year in which the spotlight fell on the use of trade agreements to make rules for the Internet behind closed doors, and a broad consensus emerged that this needs to change. ...

Why IGF main sessions suck
This year I've been involved with two of the main sessions at the upcoming IGF in Guadalajara. Being behind the scenes gives you a bit of an insight into why these always seem to end up being so disappointing. ...

Is the IGF retreating from accountability?
Just because there haven't been any updates posted here for a while doesn't mean that there haven't been any notable developments in the preparatory processes for the next Internet Governance Forum. But lacking the time to write about them, I'm just going to quote and link to some commentary from other IGF watchers. ...

Excerpts from "Criteria of meaningful stakeholder inclusion in internet governance"
My paper Criteria of meaningful stakeholder inclusion in internet governance has just been published at the Internet Policy Review. Here are some excerpts: ...

Transcript of my controversial ICANN intervention about Idea Rating Sheets
As a follow-up from the preceding post, here is what I actually said about outputs at the IGF that caused the private sector such angst. This was delivered ex tempore, so excuse the informal grammar in parts. ...

Idea Rating Sheets for validation of IGF dynamic coalition outputs
According to an informed source, the IGF's private sector stakeholders are raising a (quote) sh*tstorm about the presentation I gave at ICANN 54 about the process that the dynamic coalitions have developed for the validation of their outputs by the larger IGF community. ...

Debunking eight myths about multi-stakeholderism
From being the darling of civil society during WSIS (and soon after being repurposed by the technical community as their own guiding principle), multi-stakeholderism has entered a rough patch during the last 18 months. The phrase, and—worse—the underlying concept have quite swiftly begun to acquire a distinctly negative connotation in the public eye (at least, among those who have heard of multi-stakeholderism at all).  Amongst the civil society voices who are now treating multi-stakeholderism as a failed cause or worse, here are a few recent examples from commentators across a range of political views: ...

UNESCO resists JNC's attempt to turn "democracy" against ordinary Internet users
Today in Paris UNESCO (the United Nations Educational Scientific and Cultural Organization) finalised the outcome document from its conference, “CONNECTing the Dots: Options for Future Action”. The document is wide-ranging, and although it doesn't push the envelope as far as civil society would like on issues such as privacy and intermediary liability, it nonetheless contains some welcome and hard-fought provisions on freedom of expression (for example, recognising social media producers as worthy of similar protections as journalists), on access to information and knowledge (referencing the importance of open access, open data and FOSS), and affirming the relevance of work on network neutrality, amongst other areas. It also manages to avoid the few negative provisions that marred the NETmundial statement, and as such was welcomed by major civil society groups on the ground in Paris as a worthy outcome of one of the most consultative, multi-stakeholder processes that one could expect from a United Nations body. Since it is a non-binding document it was not put to the vote, but was accepted as a consensus outcome by acclaim, as signaled by a round of applause. ...